Access your Pro+ Content below.
Performance management gap: Goals versus realities
This article is part of the Issue 4 April 2012 issue of BI Trends + Strategies
As with most corporate initiatives, the intended goal of performance management and what it actually ends up achieving are often quite different. Many companies aren’t even aware of the real purpose of performance management. But it doesn’t have to be that way. To understand what kind of performance a performance management system is meant to manage and how to implement an effective performance management program, it’s helpful to start with a definition: Business performance management is a set of integrated, closed-loop management and analytics processes that address financial as well as operational activities. Done properly, it enables businesses to define strategic goals and then measure and manage performance against those goals. Ultimately, what is being managed is a company’s performance in achieving its goals. That’s the intent, at least—but far too often not the reality. Let’s look at why this is often the case: Reality No.1: Just fixing an isolated problem The core performance management processes include financial and ...
News in this issue
Big data makes the problem of data silos even bigger. Or does it? Either way, CIOs must make big changes to get the most out of big data analytics.
The iPad is helping to drive increased interest in mobile business intelligence, which is opening up BI data to new business users without tying them -- or existing users -- to their offices.
Successful performance management initiatives involve more than purchasing and implementing software. And despite good intentions, there’s a high probability that you’re not getting everything you should from your system.