I would specifically seek out those individuals who would be responsible (and obviously capable) of making high-level budgeting and prioritization decisions regarding the direction of the program. The budgeting decisions include hardware/software/consulting purchase, upgrades and rollouts. Prioritization occurs when deciding among the numerous directions that the program could take, especially in the early stages of a program, staffing the program appropriately for the desired level of risk/reward and monitoring progress towards the key metrics of each iteration.
Be careful of the downward delegation instincts of most of these people once presented with this opportunity. When some people hear a quasi-technical term like "business intelligence", they automatically assume that it's a technology-heavy committee and believe it must go to those tasked with that level of detail in the organization. Don't allow this to happen! This is a business-first board that will set high-level direction. A data stewardship program, at a further level down in the organization to SME individuals, will work on another level of detail.
See more of William's advice on forming a BI steering committee.
Dig Deeper on Business intelligence software
Related Q&A from William McKnight
There are loads of business intelligence tools out there on the market today. Our business intelligence expert provides some valuable resources for ... Continue Reading
Find out how Oracle’s acquisition of Sun may affect Oracle data warehouse strategy and what it means for users. Also, see what role packaged BI ... Continue Reading
Find out when you should use a DBMS with your data warehouse, and learn about the future of data warehousing data management and current state of ... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.